EMC Future Trend
The field of Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) is continuously evolving, driven by advancements in technology and changes in regulatory environments. Here are some key future trends that are shaping EMC considerations across various industries:
1. Increase in Wireless Communication
As wireless communication technologies proliferate—especially with the rollout of 5G and beyond—there is a growing need to manage the electromagnetic spectrum more effectively. The density of wireless devices and networks increases the potential for interference, making EMC considerations more critical. This trend includes:
-
New Frequency Bands: The introduction of higher frequency bands (such as millimeter waves) for 5G will require robust EMC strategies to mitigate interference and ensure reliable communication .
-
Dynamic Spectrum Sharing: More dynamic sharing of frequency bands among devices will necessitate enhanced EMC solutions to prevent interference .
2. Miniaturization and Complexity of Devices
The trend toward smaller and more complex electronic devices leads to several challenges for EMC:
-
Increased Emissions: As components are packed closer together, the potential for electromagnetic emissions increases. This makes effective shielding and layout techniques essential .
-
Design for EMC from the Start: Engineers will need to incorporate EMC considerations earlier in the design process, rather than as an afterthought, to ensure compliance .
3. The Internet of Things (IoT)
The expansion of IoT devices is creating new challenges in managing EMI/EMC:
-
Interconnectivity: With numerous devices communicating wirelessly, the risk of interference rises, requiring more sophisticated EMC solutions .
-
Scalability: Manufacturers will need scalable EMC testing solutions that can accommodate a wide range of devices, from simple sensors to complex home automation systems .
4. Advancements in Testing Methods
-
Automated EMC Testing: The move toward automation in EMC testing will streamline the certification process, making it faster and more efficient. Automated testing systems can provide consistent and repeatable results, reducing the time and cost of compliance .
-
Simulations and Modeling: Improved computational tools for simulating electromagnetic environments will help engineers identify potential EMC issues during the design phase, leading to better-prepared products .
5. Regulatory Changes and Global Harmonization
-
Stricter Regulations: As technology evolves, regulatory bodies may impose stricter EMC standards to address new challenges posed by emerging technologies. Companies will need to stay abreast of these changes to maintain compliance .
-
Global Harmonization of Standards: Efforts are being made to harmonize EMC standards globally, which can simplify compliance for manufacturers operating in multiple markets .
6. Sustainability and Eco-Friendly Practices
As industries shift towards sustainable practices, the need for eco-friendly EMC solutions is emerging:
-
Materials and Components: The use of environmentally friendly materials in the production of electronic devices can lead to changes in EMC strategies .
-
Energy Efficiency: EMC design will increasingly consider energy efficiency, aligning with broader sustainability goals in manufacturing .
7. AI and Machine Learning in EMC
-
Predictive Analysis: Machine learning algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data from past EMC tests to predict potential issues in new designs, enhancing product reliability and performance .
-
Adaptive Testing Protocols: AI can help in developing adaptive testing protocols that can modify test conditions in real-time based on the device under test .
Automotive Pulses
Automotive pulses refer to specific transient voltage waveforms that occur in a vehicle's electrical system. These pulses are defined by standards (like ISO 7637, SAE J1113, or LV 124) and used primarily for EMC (Electromagnetic Compatibility) testing of automotive electronic components and systems.
These tests simulate real-world disturbances (like load dumps, switching transients, inductive kicks) to ensure components can survive and operate correctly in harsh automotive environments.
Modern vehicles contain many ECUs, sensors, and actuators. They're exposed to:
- Alternator spikes
- Battery disconnection
- Relay switching
- Ignition transients
- Electrostatic discharge (ESD)
To ensure reliable operation, these pulses are simulated and tested in labs.
Pulses as per ISO 7637-2
ISO 7637-2 (for 12V and 24V systems)
The most widely used for electrical transients on supply lines.
Pulse |
Description |
Typical Cause |
Pulse 1 |
Negative spike |
Battery disconnect while inductive loads are ON |
Pulse 2a/2b |
Positive/negative spikes |
Switching of inductive loads |
Pulse 3a/3b |
Fast transients |
Arising from relay contact bounce |
Pulse 4 |
Voltage drop |
Engine cranking |
Pulse 5 |
Load dump |
Battery disconnect while alternator is charging |
Pulse Characteristics (ISO 7637-2)
Pulse 1
- Negative Spike
- Cause: Battery disconnection from Inductive Loads (motor, Solenoid)
- Affect: Power supply circuit, Microcontroller
Parameters | Nominal 12 V system | Nominal 24 V system |
Us | −75 V to −150 V | −300 V to −600 V |
Ri | 10 Ω | 50 Ω |
td | 2 ms | 1 ms |
tr | 1 μs | 3 μs |
t1 | ≥0.5 s | |
t2 | 200 ms | |
t3 | <100 μs |
Pulse 2a
- Positive Spike
- Cause: Sudden interruption of current due to sudden disconnection of large loads
- Affect: Voltage regulators and semiconductors devices
Parameters | Nominal 12V & 24V system |
Us | +37 V to +112 V |
Ri | 2 Ω |
td | 0.05 ms |
tr | 1 μs |
t1 | 0.2 s to 5 s |
Pulse 2b
- Negative Spike
- Cause: Alternator field decay, Alternator’s field winding de-energises after engine shutdown
- Affect: ECU Reset
Parameters | Nominal 12 V system | Nominal 24 V system |
Us | 10 V | 20 V |
Ri | 0 Ω to 0.05 Ω | |
td | 0.2 s to 2 s | |
tr | 1 ms | |
t12 | 1 ms | |
t6 | 1 ms |
Pulse 3a
- Fast Transients – Negative
- Cause: Relay chatter (very fast edge), switching processes. Characteristics of these transients are influenced by distributed capacitance and inductance of the wiring harness.
- Affect: Signal Interference and component malfunction
Parameters | Nominal 12 V system | Nominal 24 V system |
Us | −112 V to −220 V | −150 V to −300 V |
Ri | 50 Ω | |
td | 150 ns ± 45 ns | |
tr | 5 ns ± 1.5 ns | |
t1 | 100 μs | |
t4 | 10 ms | |
t5 | 90 ms |
Pulse 3b
- Fast Transients – Positive
- Cause: Relay chatter (very fast edge), switching processes. Characteristics of these transients are influenced by distributed capacitance and inductance of the wiring harness.
- Affect: Sensors and controllers
Parameters | Nominal 12 V system | Nominal 24 V system | |
Us | +75 V to +150 V | +150 V to +300 V | |
Ri | 50 Ω | ||
td | 150 ns ± 45 ns | ||
tr | 5 ns ± 1.5 ns | ||
t1 | 100 μs | ||
t4 | 10 ms | ||
t5 | 90 ms |
Pulse 4
- Cranking Pulse - Slow Negative
- Cause: Supply voltage reduction caused by energising starter motor of internal combustion engine.
- Affect: Sensors and controllers
Parameters | Nominal 12 V system | Nominal 24 V system |
Us | − 6V to − 7V | − 12V to − 16V |
Ua | − 2.5V to − 6V with |Ua| ≤ |Us| | − 5V to − 12V with |Ua| ≤ |Us| |
Ri | 0 Ω to 0.02 Ω | |
t7 | 15 ms to 40 ms | 50 ms to 100 ms |
t8 | ≤ 50ms | |
t9 | 0.5 s to 20 s | |
t10 | 5ms | 10ms |
t11 | 5ms to 100ms | 10ms to 100ms |
Pulse 5a – Load Dump
- Unsuppressed Alternator Surge- Without Protection
- In the event of a discharged battery being disconnected while the alternator is generating charging current and with other loads remaining on the alternator circuit at this moment.
- Affect: ECU, Sensor, Power circuit
Parameters | Nominal 12 V system | Nominal 24 V system |
Us | 65V to 87V | 123V to 174V |
Ri | 0.5 Ω to 4 Ω | 1 Ω to 8 Ω |
td | 40ms to 400ms | 100ms to 350ms |
tr | 10ms |
Pulse 5b – Load Dump
- Suppressed Alternator Surge- with protection (like Zener diode, TVS diode)
- In the event of a discharged battery being disconnected while the alternator is generating charging current and with other loads remaining on the alternator circuit at this moment.
- Affect: ECU, Sensor, Power circuit
Parameters | Nominal 12 V system | Nominal 24 V system |
Us | 65V to 87V | 123V to 174V |
Us* | As specified by manufacturer | |
td | 40ms to 400ms | 100ms to 350ms |
Testing Setup
Usually tested in the lab using an EMC test bench with:
- Pulse generators
- Coupling/decoupling networks
- Oscilloscopes
- Electronic loads or real DUTs
The DUT (Device Under Test) must withstand or operate normally depending on the pulse.
Other Standards
- SAE J1113 – Similar to ISO 7637, North American usage
- LV 124 / LV 148 – German standards for 12V/48V systems (used by BMW, VW, Daimler, etc.)
- ISO 16750-2 – Broader set including electrical load, jump start, reverse polarity, etc.
Conducted Emission
Conducted emissions refer to electromagnetic disturbances that are transmitted through conducting wires or cables connected to an electrical or electronic device. These emissions can propagate along power lines, signal lines (such as data cables), and any other conductive paths that are connected to the device.
Here's a detailed breakdown of conducted emissions:
Sources:
Conducted emissions originate from various sources within electronic equipment:
-
Power Supplies: Switching power supplies and transformers can generate conducted emissions due to switching transients and harmonics.
-
Electronic Circuits: Digital circuits, especially those with fast switching speeds, can produce conducted emissions through power and signal lines.
-
Motors and Drives: Electric motors and motor drives can introduce conducted emissions into power lines due to switching frequencies and power modulation.
-
Cables and Connectors: Poorly shielded or improperly grounded cables can act as antennas, radiating conducted emissions.
Frequency Range:
Conducted emissions typically cover a wide frequency range, often from a few kilohertz (kHz) up to several hundred megahertz (MHz), depending on the nature of the emitting device and the frequency of the signals or power being processed.
-
Low Frequency Range (LF): Typically below 150 kHz, includes power line harmonics and switching noise from power supplies.
-
Radio Frequency Range (RF): Spans from 150 kHz to several hundred MHz, encompassing emissions from digital circuits, clock signals, and other high-frequency components.
Measurement and Testing:
Conducted emissions are typically measured using specialized equipment such as spectrum analyzers and conducted emission measurement receivers. Testing is conducted with the device under test (DUT) connected to a standardized test setup that simulates real-world operating conditions. Measurements are taken across specified frequency ranges to ensure compliance with applicable EMC standards.
Test Setup
Test Instrument
Below are the some Major Test equipment, required for Conducted Emission Testing
-
EMI Receiver
-
Line Impedance Stabilization Network (LISN)
-
Pulse Limiter
-
RF Cables
Test Parameters
-
Frequency Range: 9kHz to 30MHz (depends on the Product standard)
-
Detector: Quasi-Peak, Average
Test Procedure
-
Setup EUT (Equipment Under Test) at the designated place, 0.8m high on the insulated table.
-
Table must be kept on the Ground Reference plane and at a distance of 0.4m from the Vertical coupling plane.
-
EUT should be energised through LISN with the rated Voltage and current and to be set in the highest configuration to achieve max level of emission from it.
-
RF cable should be connected between LISN and EMI Receiver.
-
Set the desired frequency range, limit lines and other parameters in EMI Receiver to receive the EMI signal from the EUT.
-
Select the peaks closure to limit line and measure the Q-Peak and Average values for final measurement.
-
Repeat step 5 & 6 for every individual line and neutral.
-
Capture the data like emission level in dbµV, Limit at that particular frequency, calculate the margin to mention in the final report.
-
There are different limit lines as per different product standards.
Most of the standards refers to the below limits lines based on the end use of the product.
Conducted Emission limits_Class A
Frequency Range (MHz) |
Quasi Peak (dbμV) |
Average (dbμV) |
0.15 - 0.5 | 79 | 66 |
0.5 - 30 | 73 | 60 |
Conducted Emission limits_Class B
Frequency Range (MHz) |
Quasi Peak (dbμV) |
Average (dbμV) |
0.15 - 0.5 | 66-56 | 56-46 |
0.5 - 5.0 | 56 | 46 |
5.0 - 30 | 60 | 50 |
Electromagnetic Emissions from the DUT should be less than the limits mentioned above.
Conducted Emission Spectrum with both the Class A and Class B limits.
In summary, conducted emission testing ensures that devices meet regulatory EMC limits, contributing to reliable and interference-free operation across electrical and electronic systems.
Common-Mode vs. Differential-Mode Noise
Electrical Noise
Electrical noise is any unwanted signal superimposed on a desired electrical signal that can distort, interfere, or reduce signal fidelity. In high-speed circuits and EMC analysis, this noise is typically classified as:
-
Differential-Mode (DM) Noise
-
Common-Mode (CM) Noise
These two have different origins, transmission paths, and countermeasures.
1. Differential-Mode Noise – “Normal-mode noise”
Differential-mode noise is the voltage difference between two conductors of a signal or power line. It represents the intentional signal path where the noise rides in opposition across the two conductors.
Current Flow:
The noise flows in opposite directions in a loop between the two wires. If one conductor has a +5V spike and the other has -5V, the differential noise is 10V.
Example Use Cases:
-
Power rails: +V and GND in DC systems
-
Communication: USB, HDMI, Ethernet pairs
-
Analog signals: Sensor lines in instrumentation
Typical Sources:
-
Switch-mode power supplies (SMPS) – due to rapid switching
-
High-speed data lines – signal reflections, ringing
-
Magnetic coupling – between traces or cables
-
Load changes – from motors, solenoids, or relays
Mitigation Strategies:
-
Differential-mode filters: Series inductors with capacitors across lines
-
Matched impedance design: Prevents signal reflection and ringing
-
Twisted pairs: Cables twisted to cancel out opposing fields
-
Short trace lengths: Reduces antenna effect
2. Common-Mode Noise – “Ground-referenced noise”
Common-mode noise appears equally and in phase on both conductors relative to a common reference point, usually system ground or chassis.
Current Flow:
Both wires carry the noise in the same direction, and the return path flows through the ground plane, earth, or shielding.
Real-World Example:
-
Long USB cables pick up RF noise equally on both data lines.
-
AC power lines exposed to EMI from nearby radio towers or industrial machines.
Typical Sources:
-
Electrostatic coupling: From nearby high-voltage lines
-
Radiated emissions: Antenna-like behavior of cables or traces
-
Ground potential differences: Between system components (e.g., USB ground loop)
-
Parasitic capacitance: Between PCB traces and the chassis
Mitigation Strategies:
-
Common-mode chokes: High impedance to CM signals, low to DM signals
-
Shielded cables and connectors: With 360° termination to chassis
-
Isolated grounds: Breaks in ground loops
-
Ferrite beads/clamps: On external cables
3. Visualizing the Current Paths
Noise Type: Differential Mode
Current Direction: Opposite directions on each line, Reference Point: Across the pair, Return Path: One conductor to another
Noise Type: Common Mode
Current Direction: Same direction on both lines, Reference Point: Ground or chassis, Return Path: Through system or earth ground
4. Importance in EMC Testing
Emissions:
-
Differential-mode emissions are mostly conducted (via power/signal lines).
-
Common-mode emissions often become radiated, as CM currents form large loop areas (acting like antennas).
Compliance Implications:
-
Regulatory bodies (e.g., FCC, CISPR, IEC) test both emission types.
-
CISPR 22/32 and FCC Part 15 focus heavily on common-mode conducted emissions in lower frequency bands (150 kHz–30 MHz).
5. Filtering Techniques Comparison
Filter Type: CM Filter
Effective Against: Common-mode noise, Components Used: Common-mode choke, Y-capacitors
Filter Type: DM Filter
Effective Against: Differential-mode noise, Components Used: Series inductors, X-capacitors
Notes:
-
Y-capacitors connect from line to ground (handle CM).
-
X-capacitors go across the line pair (handle DM).
6. Example: SMPS Input Filtering
In a switch-mode power supply, both noise types are generated:
-
Differential noise arises from the switching node oscillations.
-
Common-mode noise results from parasitic capacitance between high-frequency switching nodes and the chassis.
The input filter typically includes:
-
X-capacitor across line and neutral (DM)
-
Y-capacitors from line/neutral to ground (CM)
-
Common-mode choke for both conductors
7. Application-Specific Impacts
High-Speed Digital Systems:
-
Differential signaling (LVDS, HDMI, USB) relies on clean DM paths. Noise degrades data integrity (eye diagrams, jitter).
-
CM noise can cause cross-talk between pairs or fail EMC radiated tests.
Automotive:
-
CM noise is a major concern due to long wire harnesses acting as antennas.
-
Standards like ISO 11452 and CISPR 25 require thorough CM filtering.
Medical Devices:
-
Safety and immunity to external EMI are critical—isolation transformers, CM chokes, and filtering are used to ensure patient safety and compliance (e.g., IEC 60601-1-2).
Conclusion
Aspect |
Differential-Mode Noise |
Common-Mode Noise |
Flow Direction | Opposite on conductors | Same on both conductors |
Reference | Between lines | Against ground or chassis |
Typical Source | Internal circuit switching | External EMI, parasitic coupling |
Testing Concern | Conducted emissions | Radiated + conducted emissions |
Mitigation | X-caps, twisted pairs, impedance match | CM chokes, Y-caps, shielding |
Both types of noise must be addressed for:
-
Regulatory compliance
-
Signal integrity
-
Functional reliability
Designers should always measure both types during EMC testing and implement layered filtering and shielding strategies.